Schopenhauer and the Philosophy of Pessimism
А. Ч. Бхактиведанта Свами Прабхупада
Главы
Schopenhauer and the nature of reality
German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer. And his philosophy is exactly the opposite of Hegel's rational, optimistic world order. See, his philosophy is often referred to as the philosophy of pessimism.
And actually, he was a neurotic bachelor who lived alone with his dog, and he was known for his sexual indulgence and scandalous behavior. Anyway, you can know it. Yeah. Philosophy of pessimism.
He says that reality is... So why you are fond of God? Basically, he found some value in dog. Blind and irrational. Reality is blind and irrational and capricious or whimsical. And that actually life is an evil situation.
How he is to establish his pleasure if everything is whimsical, irrational? How he'll convince others it is irrational and irresponsible? How he makes progress in his philosophical proposition?
All the animal, it is rational. So how he is irrational? Flow that will be accepted, irrational animal. He doesn't believe in rationality at all. Our plans are always upset. There's always some flaw to our reasoning.
Your reasoning may be flawed. Well, you couldn't think. But I do think the others also reasoning will be flawed. He was the first Western philosopher to read some of the Vedas.
He read Bhagavad-gītā and other Vedic scriptures. So he concluded that all phenomena are mere illusions or māyā. He borrowed that word māyā. This world is simply illusory. And that also we say.
There is rationality, there is regulation; the sun is moving, the moon is moving. Not irrational, in quite in order. Everything is in order. You cannot say that.
Just like all of our desires that we have are never fulfilled, that will never fulfill, just like in a prison house. If the prisoner desires something, no, it will never fulfill. It is meant for punishment.
So he will have to abide by the desire of the jail superintendent. He cannot. Similarly, here every living entity is a prisoner. The superintendent of prison is Durgā. Durga means force. He cannot go out. Conditioned.
So therefore, and frustration is the law here. Yeah, he points that out.
Material bondage and the cycle of karma
So but the thing is that one should be rational: that why there is frustration here? That "why" question is answered in the Vedānta-sūtra, five. Kena Upaniṣad, five. That is rational.
I don't want to be frustrated, but I'm forced to be frustrated. I don't want to die, but I am forced to die. I don't want to become old. I am forced to become old.
That this rationality must be awakened to why this is happening. That is what we thought. Nature is working in that way so that I may be intelligent to enquire. What then? There will be
question, and by questioning and answering to one of my students, we come to the conclusion: what is the aim of this one? He says that this will is composed of two, two parts: idea and will.
The ideas are sense experiences that we perceive in the world, and they're mere representatives of the will. But the will is the ultimate eternal reality. Yeah. But he says that will is the ultimate reality.
Something is... Yeah. Will is the ultimate reality, we'll find, because we desire, we will like this, we will that we shall be enjoyer of the material world. Idea was that "I shall become like Krishna."
This was the idea, and therefore I will. Krishna gave us chance, all right, to come here and fulfill your desire. So they are implicated in so many karma and becoming more and more involved.
So according to karma, he is getting different types of body and there is no end, it is going on. Yes, he says that the will is eternal.
There's always... the will is eternal and it is always incarnated in one body after another. But he describes it as a force. An impersonal force. Personal or impersonal, that will be discussed later on.
As "avan" means force. And he is being forced. Prakṛter guṇaiḥ — manas is unique. He has associated with one of the modes of material nature and, as such, he is being forced to act according to the mode.
Basically, you make your friend. She's forced. Nobody likes that. The wretched life, but she is forced because she has associated with a certain material mode's combination.
They are forced; they are coming from respectable families, there is no scarcity of money, yet they are lying on the street, dirty-dressed, dirty-haired. But that which nature is forcing me, you do it.
Because here it does say that with a certain type of quality of the nature, one will be forced. Kāraṇaṁ guṇa-saṅgo 'sya sad-asad-yoni-janmasu.
Different types of species of life, the cause is kāraṇa — guṇa-saṅgaḥ, as he is associating with the material quality. But is this force irrational, implying necessity? No, it is not irrational. It's not a will.
You desire, you will like that. And that as soon as you will, immediately material nature is helpful: "Yes, take this help, you take the help." And the force, supposing our will for something, sense enjoyment, so...
Aesthetic and ethical paths to salvation
We began yesterday, we were discussing that Schopenhauer's idea was that the world is basically an evil place. So he says that there are three means of salvation from this basically evil world.
The first means he calls aesthetic salvation, or contemplation of higher ideas which transport us above passion, just like poetry, music; by contemplating these higher ideas, then the desire — we become absent of desire.
Desire drops away and we become transported to a higher plane, not really above our will. That is mentioned by what we are doing. And actually it is happening. Just like my students. So, their normal life and this life.
They have given up their former abominable life because they have better life, better thoughts, better feeling, better eating, everything better. So mind can accommodate something.
If you always fill up the mind with Krishna, Krishna consciousness, then there is no chance of the mind being filled up with any other nonsense.
This means of salvation called aesthetic lower salvation, because they are saved from the four kinds of sinful life: illicit sex, meat-eating, intoxication, and gambling.
Because they have got better engagement, they don't like to be there. But he's referring here to art, poetry. Yes, everything is there. Here is art, we are painting.
Art, poetry — all our Bhagavad-gītā and Bhagavatam are poetries. He's describing an experience of someone in the material world who sees a nice painting there. Yeah, that we mean. Uh, we agree also.
So we do not want to keep them for a few moments, but we want to keep them continually in that consciousness. Yeah. That is Krishna contact. This aesthetic salvation is only...
The aesthetic salvation is only possible momentarily. No, contemplation of poetry and art and music is there... No, that is possible. Just like practice.
Practice: the child is practiced to play, but if he is constantly practiced to read and write, he becomes educated. So not momentary. It is a practice.
If you practice Krishna consciousness, then other consciousness will automatically vanish.
But he's describing only one type of salvation called aesthetic salvation, where one transcends the normal state of desire by seeing art or hearing music or poetry. Only this momentary transcendence. Why momentary?
It can be continued perpetually. By seeing pictures and art... Oh yes, you see Rādhā-Krishna picture, you see the deity, well- dressed deity, artistically flowered, so always see. So why momentary?
Even aesthetically one can have permanent salvation.
Because Krishna consciousness movement is all goodness, we find whatever the so-called philosophers will prescribe, we have got already there, already there. If you say aesthetic salvation, this is aesthetic salvation.
Śrī-vigrahārādhana-nitya-nānā-śṛṅgāra-tan-mandira-mārjanādau. So worship the deity, and you cannot derive benefit unless the aesthetic senses applied to the higher authority with reverence and respect. That is what.
So he sees the second type of salvation from this, uh, basically evil existence. That salvation he prescribes in the beginning, that is temporary salvation. Yes.
So this type of salvation, uh, called ethical salvation, is permanent? It is not salvation. It is part-time. It is called, uh, śmaśāna-vairāgya.
Śmaśāna-vairāgya means, uh, just like a man dies, uh, somebody dies, so his relatives take him to the crematorium or the burning place.
So at that time he gets little renouncement: "Oh, this is the end of life, why you are struggling?" And again, as soon as he comes from crematorium, he begins again. He forgets that he has to die. Isn't it?
But this kind of śmaśāna-vairāgya will not help. Actually this is not salvation. He says it's only momentary. Momentary. So no. We, we, we want to give actual salvation, perpetually aesthetic ideas about Krishna.
So now he describes three types of salvation. That was the first type, momentary. The second type he calls ethical salvation.
He says that because the final aim and the aim of our life is the final satisfaction of the will, after which no more desires will arise. This being our aim of life. That means the supreme will. He does not know that.
Satisfy the supreme will. Just like father wants to do something, his son, the spiritual master, the teacher wants.
So yasya prasādād bhagavat-prasādo. Our philosophy is to please the Supreme, the spiritual master, the representative of God or God. That means Supreme Will. Not my will, but the Supreme Will.
That is, uh, highest perfection, that is health. It is like, uh, a person who is working under the guidance of a superior man; actually they do so. It's like in factories there is a foreman.
Uh, so ordinary workers are working, but the foreman is giving direction. Similarly, that means he is fulfilling the desire of the superior. He is not doing his own whim.
He is doing according to the direction of the superior man present there. So this is the philosophy: that if you can satisfy the Supreme Will, then you are living.
Just like Kṛṣṇa says: «sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja». This is Supreme Will, order. If you can fulfill this, then... You say that immorality comes about through egoism, so that I can... Yes.
If you think that, uh, "Why should I surrender to Kṛṣṇa? Uh, Kṛṣṇa is also a person, I am also a person, why is He demanding?" — just like that, what Radhakrishnan said. Sophistry.
It is, it is too much that one person is demanding that you give up everything and surrender it to Me. So this, they cannot understand that to surrender to the Supreme Will, to satisfy the Supreme Will, that is helpful.
Compassion and the basis of surrender
That is that this egoism or this desire is crushed through love and sympathy for others. Love and sympathy for others. Yeah. Without love, nothing can... If I do not love Kṛṣṇa, I cannot surrender. It is not possible.
Just like a small child is naturally surrendered to the parents because there is love. The child loves also the parents. So without the basic principle of love, the more you love, the more the surrender is also perfect.
Just like a small child, uh, you slap the child, he is crying, they're crying also with the words "Mommy, Mommy, Mommy, Mommy." Because there is love. Even in this distress, the child cannot follow. That is natural.
Similarly, when you remain fully surrendered to the Supreme Will, either in distress or in happiness, that is your happiness. That is real happiness. When there is love, uh, surrender. This condition cannot be without love.
In any condition, you remain surrendered. It cannot be done without love. When there is lack of love, uh, this kind of mentality you cannot do. Then, "In any condition I shall remain."
Just like you are, you are, a whole society is carrying my order. Not that I'm... because I'm a superior person. There is love. Without love, you cannot do so.
You have got some bit of love for me, therefore you carry my order. Otherwise, not for you. And I cannot also... you are foreigners, you are Americans, I came from another country, I had no account.
I cannot also order you, "You must be." Otherwise I will chastise. Because there is love, it is a connection of love, I can also become bold enough to chastise you.
And you also, uh, in whatever condition you carry my order, this the basic principle is love. And our whole philosophy is love. We are just trying to learn how to love Krishna.
So without love, the basic principle of love, these things cannot be conceived. His idea is that we must love those who are suffering. If we love those who are suffering, then we lose our desire.
Yeah, that is that... why you should love the suffering and not those who are... Well, he says everyone is suffering. And, uh, yes. Actually, we say everyone is suffering.
Anyone who is under the condition of material nature is suffering. And that is, uh, real love. Patitānāṁ pāvanebhyo, or Krishna is described as the deliverer of all the fallen souls.
Patitānāṁ pāvanebhyo vaiṣṇavebhyo namo namaḥ. Vaiṣṇavam. Why you have taken sannyāsa? You are going... why, what is the meaning of preaching? You are not going to preach for earning some money. Money you can earn.
Just like Mukunda. When he was here, he could not earn; now he's earning some money. So not for money you have taken sannyāsa, but for sympathy of the others.
They said Rūpa Gosvāmī, Sanātana Gosvāmī, they took sannyāsa, gave up government service. Why? Out of love for the mass of people. Loka-hitārtha-kārī.
Being compassionate to the poor fellows who are simply wasting their time like cats and dogs, just to show them some sympathy. Is it? Just to inform them that this is not your life. Here is life. Be Krishna-parāyaṇa.
This is sympathy. He says that sympathy is real. They are suffering for want of knowledge; in ignorance they are suffering. Therefore this is sympathy: to see suffering.
They are thinking, "Because I have got a... I have got a nice car, I'm happy." But actually he's not happy.
But he may think, out of ignorance we may think, that "I have got a nice car, I've got a nice apartment, I've got a nice girlfriend, so I'm happy." But actually he's not happy, he's suffering. So this is sympathy.
This you have taken sannyāsa, you are going to preach, I thought you being compassionate with the others. That is real love. Because you love Krishna and they are part and parcel of Krishna.
So you know that they are suffering for want of Krishna consciousness. Therefore you are going to teach. This is for Krishna. He says that love, real love means sympathy, not sex life. No, sex life is animal.
That is not love. That is lust. We always repeat this. Sex life is lust. That is not love. Here is their love: they are suffering for want of Krishna consciousness.
Let us do something so that they may understand the values of life. Here is love. Sex is you satisfy your senses and the other party satisfies her senses. That is sex. So that is lust. You are lusty, she is lusty. That's all.
There is no love. It is going on in the name of love, rascal. It is not lust. It is lust. They do not know it. Lusty thing has been accepted as love. Mr. Brahmā. Brahmā, Mr. Illusion. Illusion is accepted as something else.
Lust is accepted as love. This is illusion.
Consequences of suicide and transmigration
He says that, uh, permanent happiness comes about when we lose our desire to live. When, when we deny, when we deny, deny the will to live, that is frustrated. That is frustration.
That is suicide, just like one man is very much suffering. He does not find any other means, then he cuts his own throat or hangs himself or takes some poison. Well, suppose now I'm, I'm
desiring to live so much that I'm always desiring. Are you desiring or not desiring? Because you are foolish and do not know that you have to live. Desire or not desire. Because you are eternal. You have to live.
But if you don't, uh, live in Krishna consciousness, then you'll have to live in abominable conditions, like trees, like you have to live. The modern civilization, they do not know that.
Uh, there's a tree is also living, I'm also living. So I, so why these two different conditions are there? I am living. We are living, every one of us living eternally.
But according to our karma, according to our work, creative activities, we are getting different bodies. But we have to live. There's no question of not living. And there's a will... Schopenhauer, uh, rascal.
One who does not know, he commits suicide. He thinks that if I commit suicide, then everything is finished. That is his ignorance. He's going to get another abominable body. Ghost. He becomes a ghost.
So that he, he suffers more. A ghost means he has got subtle body, mental body. Mind, intelligence, everything is there. Mind is there, intelligence, ego is there, but no gross body. So he cannot enjoy that.
And that is mostly life. Suppose I am bound up by the desire to live. So that I'm always in... So if desire, good desire to live, good. Change your desire.
That is our program: change your conception and live nicely with Krishna. That is our program. We don't say you die. You live. But live with Krishna conception and you become happy. So the will to live must not be denied.
No, but you cannot do that. That is not possible. That is impossible. The same man who was doing all nonsense and now they are mad after Krishna. So will is there.
Formerly he was willing to do all nonsense, now he's willing to serve Krishna. So will is not banished. No. But we have been engaged in a good willing program. That's why. No. Not for a second.
That they do not believe in his soul. They have no idea. They desire a state of non-willingness. The Buddhists desire a state of nothing.
No, their philosophy is that willingness is a symptom at a certain condition of material combination. So you dismantle this material condition, so there will be no more will. Yeah, yeah. That is that. Yeah.
But that is not that. That's not possible. You don't think it's possible to stop will? No, how it can be? Because you are permanent. Therefore thinking, feeling, willing goes with you.
The thinking, feeling, willing actually carries you from this gross body to another gross body. How transmigration is taking place. I must say gross here; they see that this body is dead.
But he does not know the body is dead. But the willing is not dead. He is being carried out by the willing. That he has no eyes to see. He is simply seeing this gross body is dead, finished.
But he has no eyes to see that this soul is now being carried away by this subtle body willing. Another one. According to his willing, he gets another body, gross body. Either demigod or dog. As he will say. As he wills. Yeah.
At the time of death. Because the will is the carrier. Suppose he wills nothing at the time of death. That is not possible. That is not possible. Even even in dream you think.
The body is sleeping, completely stopped, but still while you are dreaming. Does not enquire about his output of self-realization. What about his acting is defeat? It's not advanced.
Suffering and the need for guidance
That's what he points out: that whenever we gratify our desires, that is so-called happiness, and whenever our desires are frustrated, that is suffering.
But our desires are continuously frustrated; they're never satisfied. So he said that we are always suffering. And that the more intelligent a person is, the more he suffers.
The more intelligent a person is, the more he suffers. Yeah. By suffering, one's intelligence becomes manifested. Oh. Suffering sharpens the intelligence? Yeah. Adversity is a blessing, some adversity.
That's where a businessman, losing some money in some, becomes more intelligent that this business should not be done.
I think I think yesterday Hegel described it in terms of conflict, that through conflict progress comes down. Yeah. So here is a partial conflict with māyā.
The name mama māyā, you fight against the māyā, māyā is putting impediment. What I think it is right, māyā breaking.
That's what he sees as the irrational Hitler plan last season and so many well, uh, māyā broke it in the pieces. The British, they also formed the British Empire, uh, māyā broke it, Roman Empire, so oh, this frustration.
But we are so fooled, the initiative frustration, we are still trying to do the same thing. That is explained in the Bhāgavatam: punaḥ punaś carvita-carvaṇānām. Chewing the chewed. Chewing the chewed.
He has, he has been frustrated in so, so many ways in sexual life, uh, divorce this way. Again, another, another way. So what is the another way? The same thing. Sex. But he's making his trial. Now again. Again.
That is very nicely explained in your, in a, three times tiger. Three times, that is mean carvita-carvaṇānām. Chewing the chewed. He should have an experience. But I am changing, but what is the change?
The same sex life, everyone changed me. But he has no intelligence. He says that because there is no, no end to our, uh, striving. There is end.
Provided we can end everything, all this miscalculations, provided he goes to the right person. But that he is not good. He becomes self-made philosopher. He will not accept guru.
So because of that there's no measure for suffering. Yes. Suffering. You'll suffer continually. Just like if a man who is diseased, suffering from so many things. He should approach a physician.
But if he wants to suffer without consultation of the physician, he will suffer for the... He says that this will does not care for the individual's satisfaction, but only for the perpetuation of the species.
For instance, uh, I have a sex life, it is not satisfying to me personally. It simply, uh, perpetuates the species. In all species there's sex life. Yes.
But it isn't satisfying, uh, it isn't satisfying ultimately, and the satisfaction dwindles immediately afterward. So he says that this, this is a trick by the will just to perpetuate the species. Why that is a trick?
Well, I would think, I think that by this sex life I will be satisfied. That's a trick of the will. But I find I'm not satisfied by it. Yeah. And simply the race goes on, the species goes on. Yeah. That, that, that's nice.
But, uh, he must be given a point or a goal that he gave himself. Where is that goal? That goal, he says it doesn't exist. He does not know. But he, he says—I'll read a statement of his.
It says that the will, uh, forces a person to remain alive even when there is nothing for which to live. It impels him to live and suffer another day, even when there is no hope or promise of any pleasant future prospect.
It is like the alms which the beggar receives from life today that he may hunger again on the morrow. For all men, irrespective of their status, the essence of life is misery and frustration. Yes. That is a good point.
But why he's hankering after something? Why is he hankering after? He's being cast at will. Therefore, the conclusion is there is a goal. He is hungering after that goal.
But he has not as yet, uh, uh, uh, approached that goal, achieved that goal. Therefore, to understand what is the goal, why should I go to this Janārdana or that sage? He has no idea of any goal.
He says that life is a waste of effort. That means he, that he's not a particular effort. The thing is that when I'm willing to have some solution, there must be some solution. There must be some solution.
But I do not know what is the solution. Huh. If I will have some solution, there must be some solution. Crying. But the mother's breast-feeding. Crying, crying, crying. Very sad.
As long as the breast feeding is given in the mouth.
So I shouldn't know what the child is wanting, why this is, that, uh, human life must be some kind of mistake, and but the greatest crime of man is that he was ever born.
Well, that's all. Then, then back to somebody who punishes him for his crime. Is it not? The greatest crime we suffer. That there must be somebody who is judge. That you are killing that, you must suffer.
You must be going, must take that job. So who is that? He doesn't believe in God. Actually, uh, that means nonsense.
Anyone who doesn't believe... He says that, uh, because the world is so mad that it could not possibly have any author, because, uh, if there was a God, that God would have set the world in order.
Well, while he's mad, we have got experience that there are madmen, but there is hospital also for treating men. Similarly, the world may be mad, but there is hospitalization that it does not come.
Practical experience we see that there are many madmen. At the same time there is a hospital, lunatic hospital where treatment is done. So he does not see that.
He has no knowledge where is the hospital, how they can be treated. This is accepted. The one is mad, that's all right. But there is treatment.
Because in our experience, practical experience, whenever there is disease, there is some treatment. But he does not know what is the treatment.
When we discussed, he's speaking of sinful life, said this life, but he does not have said, who is the judge to give me the resultant action of my sinful life?
The world is mad, but he does not know where the treatment of madman is done. He does not know. Therefore his knowledge is imperfect. And he still is philosophizing. That is the difference.
Vedic knowledge and the perfect creation
Our proposition is that unless one is perfect, we cannot take knowledge. That is our position. That's why our authority is Vedas.
Vedas means knowledge, perfect knowledge. Vedānta is knowledge, perfect knowledge. Why it is perfect? Because it is given by God. tene brahma hṛdā ya ādi-kavaye.
The basic knowledge was imparted to the Brahmā within the heart. So the perfect knowledge is coming from the Supreme Perfect. When you take that knowledge, then your knowledge is perfect. Otherwise you become...
You can become Dr. Frog. Once before we were discussing a philosopher named Leibniz. And Leibniz said that this is the best of all possible worlds. And you agreed.
You said, "Yes, this is the best of all possible worlds, because it's God's arrangement." But, uh, Schopenhauer says that this is the worst of all possible worlds.
In the sense that because Krishna created it, or God created it, that it was the best arrangement. What Krishna creates, that is like pūrṇam adaḥ pūrṇam idam pūrṇāt pūrṇam udacyate. Everything is perfect.
The world is perfect. So there is no doubt. But the nature of the world being material, there are three qualities. They are also working perfectly. As you want to get the... Reaction.
Then what would you say if Schopenhauer says this is the worst of all possible worlds? Why "worst"? We don't say "worst." Because it's so full of things. Nothing can be "worst" which is created by God.
Why God's creation, "worst"? Why he says "worst"? Because it's so full of madness and frustration. They're making it successful.
We get so many letters from our students; first frustrated, but now they are thinking that they are safe. So frustration is another help, but provided we take the real center, then frustration is not bad.
It says that the working of the world... if you are put into some dangerous position, but if you know how to save yourself, that danger will be later on a feeling of pleasure, I guess. Pleasure, I guess.
He says that the working of the world is ethically evil. For instance, he observes—and to some extent that is alright— because when you are in prison life, you'll find evil. But that evil is good for you.
So that you can learn some lesson, and when you are out of the prison you'll not come back. That is the blessings of evil. Blessings of evil. Yes.
For instance, in the animal kingdom he observes the brutality of one animal eating another animal. And he says that this is life's pattern: one disappointment after another.
Well, they... the "washed brute" is the human being who is eating animals. Animals are called brutal because we are eating another animal, and the human being who is eating animals is the "washed brute."
Because in spite of his sense, he's violated. He's the washed animal. He says that happiness is a, is a negative state. It only means a, a momentary suspension of suffering. Yeah, that is explained.
Śāntam, dāntam, janaiḥ... rādānanda-vid-acitta. And the man is destined to be punished, his foot within the water. And he's almost on the point of suffocation. He is taken. He feels, uh, happy.
He does not... "Oh, again I am..." "Again I am." And he... so he says that happiness here is temporary relief.
But, uh, if he is intelligent enough, then he will not do something which may put him into that unhappiness. But suicide is, is no escape from evil because the will is indestructible and eternal.
Yeah, it's simply putting himself in the wall. By suicide, he becomes a ghost; that's more trouble. Because the body given by, uh, God, and he is killing. So from this body he has to accept another body.
So unless that point comes, he has to remain a ghost, no body. Suppose I have to live in this body 80 years, I make suicide.
So after five years, I'll have to remain ghost, no one, then it may be chance to get another visit. Killing of anybody... because mā hantavyaḥ sarva-bhūtāni is for all day.
So one can put this argument that the soul is everlasting. So body is killed. But that's alright, body is killed. But you cannot kill the body to help his progress. One living entity is destined to live in a certain body.
If you destroy that body, then he has to wait for the next body. That means you are, uh, interfering with his progress; therefore you are sinful. Just by living in this apartment. If somebody by force drives me out...
If I go to the police, that "I was living in this apartment and this man by force has driven me out." Is it a free man? So I am not lost because I am driven out of this room.
But you are liable for criminal punishment because you have forced me to be out. fault. If a man is an animal scale, the soul is immortal, so it is, it is there. The real pleasure is here.
The soul is destined to live in a certain body for a certain period. If you prematurely stop it, then you become responsible. Exactly like that. I am living in my apartment. By force, you are killing it.
They do not know all this. Imperfect law. He says that the bodies are manifestations of the will. Yeah. But whose will? The will — he calls it the will in the abstract.
No, that is not so. When we say it's will, then the will must be for a person. Yeah. That it doesn't look like... we only have experience that will is coming from a person. Yeah.
But what about the will of electricity and gravity, these forces of nature, aren't they all? That is the will of a person. They make a computer machine. He has will. A computer machine has a will also. Will, not wheel.
It is so mechanically added, it is acting. It's like a record is singing. Oh. Outside, you know, who is singing. Oh. Computer doesn't... I am made to sing. The computer is not the animal. The real brain is the one who made it.
The computer doesn't have a will, but it expresses the will of some mechanism. Yes, the mechanical element is so nice by the brain of the manufacturer that it is acting.
So he says that this blind will must continuously reincarnate time after time. There's no stopping it. No. So that we cannot become nothing, we must endure. No, we have something, I don't care.
Therefore, he says that we must endure our state, our suffering state, and make the best of a bad bargain. You should endure, at the same time, you should find out the way that you are suffering and stop. That is it.
That isn't it. He says that, uh, life is more than a disappointment, it is a form of deception, and all human beings born into this world are condemned not to death but to life. That we say.
But we give also hope that in this way, if you... it will be happy. Your life will be blissful. We say this is cultural life and this is blissful life. That is Krishna's answer. So he has no such knowledge.
He is simply saying he contemplates. He has no knowledge of the blissful side. That was important. Yeah. So all the time... do you have... so this, this kind of level we accept that... my man, now please get it.
He's blind and I'm the blind man. So tomorrow we'll finish Schopenhauer's experience. The willing cannot discover. Therefore you have to reform your willing to it. That is Krishna.
Religious salvation and purifying the will
He says now... he mentions a third type of salvation called religious salvation. He says this is the highest.
But his idea of religious salvation is asceticism, that by denying the will, then we can... Yes, that is, that is in one sense, that you don't will anything which is not favorable to Krishna's service.
That is not what it is. Ānukūlyasya saṅkalpaḥ. This is out of the six items of surrender, these are the two items: that you should give up, uh, things which are not favorable in execution of devotional...
You should give up. Uh, that's how the willing you should give up. And, and you should accept everything which is favorable for Krishna. So willing cannot be... our process is to purify it.
Sarvopādhi-vinirmuktaṁ tat-paratvena nirmalam. So this you are working. Somebody is working: "I am American." Uh, "I must, uh, do this as American." "I am communist." "I must do this."
This is super... according to designation, their willing. And when we come to this willing, simply to serve Krishna, that is designationless. That sort of willing is suppression, not willing with designation.
He's thinking of willing of designation, but practically that's the same as not willing. Willing without designation. Not willing, you cannot say. Not willing bad, but willing good. That is, that is called purification.
Sarvopādhi-vinirmuktaṁ tat-paratvena nirmalam. So we are, we are willing. We are willing to serve Krishna. We are willing to preach Krishna's glory. This kind of willing, willing is now reformed. This is real willing.
Because I'm part and parcel of Krishna, so I must will according to Krishna's will. Just like this hand is part and parcel of my body, it is moving according to my will.
He, he says that through self-mortification that we can destroy the willing process altogether. That is impossible. That is, that's kind of... That is not possible. Nobody can destroy the willing power.
I'll just read one thing.
He says, uh, "Eventually the ascetic will exist only as a pure knowing being, the undimmed mirror of the world. Nothing can trouble him more, nothing can move him, for he has cut all the thousand cords of will which hold us bound to the world, and as desire, fear, envy, anger drag us hither and thither in constant pain.
To such a man life is an illusion to which he must be indifferent." So his idea is that you cut all the cords of will which bind us to this material world. Then? Nothing. Nothing.
That means he is the philosopher of śūnyavāda. Yes. Śūnyavāda. Nirviśeṣa-śūnyavāda. So we are calling this kind of philosopher śūnyavāda. But you cannot become śūnya. Mm-hmm. It is not possible.
But his, he, he has a similar idea to the Buddhist. He says that we repudiate desire and pass into nirvana or nothingness. That is not possible. This is simply lack of knowledge.
Just like the same philosophy: that there is danger before me, I cannot protect me from the danger, I simply close my eyes. Ah, the danger remains there. He thinks by closing the eyes, he thinks, "Now I'm out of them."
That is his foolishness. You know? Small animals. Yes, rabbits and monkeys. They close the eyes. There was a—I do not know whether I heard that— there was an artistic competition prize still.
That one has to paint a picture that, before the mother, a son is being killed. So the artist has to paint the facial expression for the mother.
So so many artists paint so many; one artist painted the mother closed the eyes. He got the first prize, because this kind of suffering cannot be expressed. The best thing is close. Ah, I see.
Yeah, that this is definitely: close the eye, I am no longer, no longer exist. But that is not that. You have to exist, my dear sir, and you have to die. You have to become a tree. It's like a tree exists. It does not lie.
But practically it is not existing. Cut it, insult it, kick it. But that kind of existence will be the salvation for this respect. Remain a tree for ten thousand years. No sense.
He says where there is no will, then there is no idea, no world. And that is all explained. And that means when there is no sense, pain and pleasure, as they say, there is no will. But this is not will. It is suppression.
Suṣupti, it is called suṣupti. There are three stages. One stage is that I have... Another stage is that I'm not awakening, I'm sleeping, but dreaming. And another stage is unconscious. Three stages.
But in three stages the will is... Because then I will see an unconscious person again comes to consciousness. "Oh, I have to do this, I have to go there." What can it come? It is called supta-utthāna.
Supta-utthāna means you are sleeping, but when you are awakened, you may immediately remember your duties, past and present. No, it cannot be. That is the function of the soul.
The soul is eternal and the willing is eternal. It can be suppressed for some time. That's like death. What is death? Death means stop willingness for seven months, that's all. That is that.
And as soon as according to your will you develop a type of body and come out from your mother's womb, you are a willing being again. Death means suppression of will for several months.
Suppression of willing, just like if you are chloroformed, if you are given anesthetic, you can suppress the willing as far as you are unconscious. I mean, somebody is cutting you, you don't protest.
But that doesn't mean the will is not there. It is suppressed by artificial means. Otherwise, will cannot be killed, you cannot be stopped. If you train your willing process badly, then you have to suffer life after life.
I mean, you train with willing nicely, then you go to Vaikuṇṭha or after that. Yes. That is, and that is willingness in a negative way. "I shall not will. I shall not."
Because I have got experience that by willing I have suffered so much, so I shall not. That stage you cannot stay for a long time. Then you have to again will in the same way.
What about these men who perform great austerity and lash their body and starve and... That is the same thing, not really. They have no knowledge of good willing. They therefore simply want to kill bad willing.
Because they are insufficient in knowledge that in this way willing cannot be stopped. It's like a child is accustomed to play. If you stop playing, then he will be dull, he'll be diseased.
But you must give him good engagement. That's like... Stop playing. He must, uh, worship Jagannātha and say, "This is māyā." It's that. And she's engaged in vātsalya-bhāva.
So give good engagement, good willing, and you will automatically give up all this nonsense badly. But if you want to stop artificially willing, that will not happen. That if I don't stop for the time, that it will again.
So you go through so much trouble. So therefore the Māyāvādī, the impersonalist, because they are not willing to serve Krishna, they stop willing, they can fall down. That's like your free time is willing and tamas.
You have to will badly or godly. So better try to will godly than badly or oppositely. This is our purpose. We don't stop willing. Yes, we will, but Krishna's service. So that's all the show we have.